More HOLIDAY BAH-HUMBUG HUMOR – CARTOONS (mostly)
The Top One Reason Religion Is Harmful By Greta Christina, AlterNet.
Religion is uniquely armored against anything that might stop it from spinning into extreme absurdity, extreme denial of reality and extreme, grotesque immorality.
So what is it about religion — exactly — that’s so harmful?
I’ve argued many times that religion is not only mistaken, but does more harm than good. But why do I think that is?
Sure, I can make a list of specific harms religion has done, from here to Texas. I’ve done exactly that. But that’s not enough to make my case. I could make long lists of harms done by plenty of human institutions: medicine, education, democracy. That doesn’t make them inherently malevolent.
Why is religion special — and specially troubling? What makes religion different from any other ideology, community, system of morality, hypothesis about how the world works? And why does that difference make it uniquely prone to cause damage?
The debates about religion usually come in two types: “is religion accurate or mistaken,” and “is religion helpful or harmful.” And ever since I put together my best “mistaken” arguments, my Top Ten Reasons I Don’t Believe in God, I’ve been trying to wrap up my “harmful” arguments in a similar nutshell.
But I’m realizing that I don’t have ten arguments for why religion is harmful. I don’t even have 57,842 arguments.
I have one.
I’m realizing that everything I’ve ever written about religion’s harm boils down to one thing.
It’s this: Religion is ultimately dependent on belief in invisible beings, inaudible voices, intangible entities, undetectable forces, and events and judgments that happen after we die.
It therefore has no reality check. READ MORE:
http://www.alternet.org/belief/143912/the_top_one_reason_religion_is_harmful_
- Freedom from Religion Foundation
The following is an actual question given on a University of Arizona chemistry mid-term, and an actual answer turned in by a student.
Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?
Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle’s Law (gas cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed) or some variant. One student, however, wrote the following:
First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving, which is unlikely. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave; therefore, no souls are leaving. As for how many souls are entering Hell, let’s look at the different religions that exist in the world today.
Most of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there is more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle’s Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added.
This gives two possibilities:
1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose.
2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.
So which is it?
If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my Freshman year that, ‘It will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you,’ and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night, then number two must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over. The corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is therefore, extinct….. ….leaving only Heaven, thereby proving the existence of a divine being which explains why, last night, Teresa kept shouting ‘Oh my God.’
HOLIDAY BAH-HUMBUG HUMOR – CARTOONS (mostly)
FOR HARD CORE students of the great mystery: ALICE and YUYA
SERIOUSLY, PEACE AND LOVE. BEST WISHES FOR A MUCH BETTER NEW YEAR. May all the Repuglicon grinches eat deep-dish humble pie.
Tags: bah hum-bug, Christianity, christmas cartoons, christmas humor, funny, holiday humor, lost ark, moses, mummies, parody, snoopy, st. paul at the crossroads, st. peter, televangelism, yuya and tuya
December 30, 2011 at 11:30 pm |
I’m afraid the “university mid-term” story has been pretty thoroughly debunked, although it’s still a fun story:
http://www.snopes.com/college/exam/hell.asp
December 30, 2011 at 11:42 pm |
beerslayer – Yeah, I just think it’s funny. Another writer points out that the student didn’t know his Dante – the lowest circle of Hell is “frozen.” Go figure: must be a sort of a localized global warming climate change phenomenon, huh? Thanks for comment!